What kind of Government do we have in Alberta ? Canada?

Our political leaders state that in Canada we have a Democracy, which is defined as:
:A form of government in which the people freely govern themselves; where the executive (or administrative) and law-making (or legislative) power is given to persons chosen by the population; the free people. Legal Dictionary http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/D/Democracy.aspx

1. Government by the people, exercised either directly or through elected representatives.

2. A political or social unit that has such a government.

3. The common people, considered as the primary source of political power.

4. Majority rule.

5. The principles of social equality and respect for the individual within a community.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/democracy

---

But then anyone who has witnessed the workings of our Governments in Canada in the past few years, will recognize that we have not been living in a Democratic Society, especially those who live in Alberta, where our Land Owner Rights (as an example) have been dwindling away at a very fast pace, Equal Justice as another example. As all this is by Governments that act on their own with no regard to what the Citizens of 

Alberta or Canada have to say, which in turn leads us to another style of Government known as Dictatorship

1.

a country, government, or the form of government in which absolute power is exercised by a dictator.

2.

absolute, imperious, or overbearing power or control.

3.

the office or position held by a dictator.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/dictatorship

There have been many, including Politicians, that use the word Socialist on those who speak up against the actions of our Rights being eroded away for the benefit of Corporations, just as our Environment is suffering for the same reason's:
Definition of Socialism
1

: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods

2

a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

3

: a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done 

 via http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/socialism

A vast majority of Canadians and Albertans have increasingly stated that our Governments are Puppets of a puppet master, some are under the impression that we are controlled by U.S & other foreign influences , while others claim it to be Corporate interests(possibly all of the above), especially in Alberta where it seems that Large Corporations dealing in Energy , like Oil , Electricity , even our water is who pulls the strings of  the present Alberta Government.

Puppet Governments:

A government that is under the control of another power.

http://www.answers.com/topic/puppet-government#ixzz1CYalGK67

puppet government - a government that is appointed by and whose affairs are directed by an outside authority that may impose hardships on those governed pupet regime, puppet state authorities, government, regime - the organization that is the governing authority of a political unit; "the government reduced taxes"; "the matter was referred to higher authorities" http://www.thefreedictionary.com/puppet+government Fascism: a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.

Seems what really have is a cross between Dictatorship, Socialist & Puppet Governments and Fascism as there is no evidence of Democracy in this country, under our present Leading Political Parties.

Gangs: What are they?

I have heard for many years, with more attention each year regarding the gangs in our cities, before that it was regarding outlaw bike gangs and the harm to our society they inflict.

Webster's definition of a Gang :
1) A group of people associated or working together.
 2) A group of people associated for some criminal or anti-social purpose.
3) To form into a gang.
4) to gang up on; to attack as a group.


 #1:
A group of people associated or working together:
Covers every known association, group, corporation, political party, employees or any congregation of people that work together for any purpose.

#2:
A group of people associated for some criminal or anti-social purpose:

This definition relates directly to the Gangs that we mainly associate this word to, the criminal gangs, street gangs, outlaw biker gangs etc.

#3:
To form into a gang:
This where recruiting come into play, the gang with the most members has the best odds of overcoming rival gangs, in recruiting more of those who follow the thoughts and mindset of the other gang members to promote their beliefs, causes and power, no matter right or wrong, legal or not.

#4:
To gang up on; to attack as a group:

What was once called Ganging upon physically is now known as "Swarming" which is a form of inflicting terror upon the subject that has been chosen to attack. That kind of ganging can be done in various ways:
by 2 or more people mocking and ridiculing another for various purposes, to instill Terror, for Humiliation, to Pressure others into doing their bidding , in some cases just to allow for the "Gang"  to fulfill their wishes of recognition, authority over others, to aggressively defend that particular gang and denounce their rivals while defending the negative of their gang upon others.

I am a sportsman, love the outdoors and all that goes with it, I sometimes (mostly out of boredom) like to  call going "Fishing", as a rule I openly bring out the truth of Political Parties, which a few times gets some retaliation by the party supporter's, who call me a liar and want proof of what I say , of which I supply 99.9% of the time; while those who ask, refuse to accept the evidence 99% of the time, with comments of take it to the courts then if you have so much evidence: you can't take criminal acts to be investigated of those who break the laws, when they are the same associates that make the Law's.

So I went fishing to find out what would happen when a situation was brought out to the Political Party followers. The first thing to happen was a form of defense, that used a rivals similar situation, to justify the actions of their rival Political Party, as in "if they can do it why can't we" , " they did it more" and many other reasons for the wrongful acts of their Party, this goes for all Political Party supporters. Where is this going to lead us? to the same situation as the States where a Party Leader/Candidate makes statements of aggression towards individuals or will it get worse as some people carry their Political beliefs higher then they do their religion's, and we all know from history on how religious beliefs have caused many violent conflicts.

I write this as I had gone "Fishing" out of curiosity of how aggressive Political Party Supporters are or can be, I picked a particular person to do this with as ( person I never met) I had been placed on a list called "Enemies of Freedom", when I went to this person with a partially true comment I was then attacked by a few others, this attack lasted over an hour and the attacks were coming in so fast I wasn't able to keep up with all of what they had to say, I became over whelmed with the flood of comments, from them defending their Party & its Leader, defamatory comments of other Parties, to being called what ever they considered an insult, a Marxist, Communist, Socialist, Liberal ,etc; having my words twisted to fit their Parties agenda of various topics and to denounce another Party that I wasn't supporting, or mentioned until after the discussion took into that direction, it had started to get way out of hand, if it wasn't for important offline obligations ( I do have responsibilities & obligations in life) I would have kept up the "discussion" to gain more insight into the extremes these people would have gone. As the main topic of discussion that started it all was over the handling & wasting of Billions and the possibly not so criminal actions, along with actual criminal actions by the Political Parties involved in this discussion.

Now back to the Title of this posting "Gangs; what are they" , from the definitions above and the actions related in this posting, the Political Parties in Canada are no different then any Street or Outlaw Biker Gang's, they all follow the Websters definition of "GANG", in every aspect , including to fulfilling requests of support  by those who are party members over those who are not, regardless of which level of Governments or which agency that is being dealt with.

Political Parties or No Parties Period?

MPs slam 'obscene' Tory patronage posts  is the head line on CBC

 Majority of the comments was about the other political party did that as well. 
comment by friend L.G:
"You know what gets me ... is they all do it .... the liberals were so bad at this its not funny. Many departments are still controlled by the liberals .... all of them do these appointments because they know if somthing goes wrong with an election"

 IMHO:
What we need is either an Honest Political party or abolish the Party system and stick with Independents, through them we can then, elect out of the Independents as to who will speak on behalf of Canadians. Place a Law; that at any time Citizens can petition for a Bi-election on that person, a recall or impeachment of any Political figure that Canadians feel who is not doing their job in the interests of Canadians as a whole. Any future corruption, criminal acts or mis-use of elected position will result in Incarceration.

Thats why I say abolish the party system which put an ending partisanship, which seems to be a major issue for everyone, from stacking the political views to corruption. Not to have those who have proven to be there for Canada as a whole, lose their positions, at one persons command, which is happening in Federal Government as well as Provincial

Therefore I believe to have the communities, choose their own community speaker, each community speaker takes concerns to regional speakers ( of whom are chosen by all those before them) keep working that way to national /international speaker for Canadians, we all have a say in our particular interest to make the decisions for Canada as we do for our individual lives.
Basically the same thing that we have now, just no party involvement, with 100% say of Canadian  Business with-in our Nation; along with International Relations: Granted to the Citizens of Canada as a whole and within their own communities, to make their voice known to the concerns of their community where those voices set the census of the community

I went and took a look at my Garden

I went and took a look at my Garden, in an attempt to get away from the situations at hand, while getting back to the basic’s of life.

Between years of attempting to expose the corruption within our Respective Governments, and seeing others make reference to the disabilities of others; as an arguing starting situation, “too each their own but don’t force it on to me”!

After taking a good look at this thought provoking subject; I asked myself, people are against many things:

Racism’s/ Prejudices of

·        Religion

·         Race

·        Disability

·        Political

·        Ability

·        Personalities

·        Speech

·        Actions

·        Thought

Most of this due to personal belief and the right to express so; many follow that right, past the extent, that fits the situation; which then becomes a personal decision of right and wrong, by following the same rules of Law/ Constitution; “for themselves only not allowed for others” ; creating a culture of self worth belief, where everyone’s concern is material /credit/ social position etc. From the common citizen to the worlds leaders the same attitudes are there.

Alias we have Governments that are proving more each day that the Country as we knew it is no-longer recognized by our Governments, as all it has become is nothing more then another weekday Soap Opera (ever watch/listen to your legislature/ Parliament) ; only the Actors are real (those in your legislature/ Parliament ) as are the lives of the Citizens.

Welcome to Real Life Monopoly; Where Canadian Elite are being charged in other Countries for Corruption; in Canada Politicians/Agencies are being accused of International Espionage, let alone the domestic actions of the same. We as the People want our Rights when Federal offices are being closed down, individual Rights legislators, prevent any actions of concern where necessary, but allowing for other concerns to be publicly addressed.

When did all this start?

Is it caused by our Governments in Canada allowing the Bureaucrats to make Personal decisions of our individual lives for their personal gain?

Is it from Corporations that deal with the Bureaucrats to get what they want? Just by Lobbying for legislation that violates the Rights of Canadians?

Corporations that have more control of the Government will guarantee only the employed will be happy (except for the bills/taxes they have to pay), even then if any discontent of the worker then it is a lock out/ strike depends on who the Corporation is, some may close that particular area of employment, deny others of medical care, violate your Rights as they wish, while our Governments ignores the situation; offering them tax breaks ; turning a blind eye to the crimes committed and then if you speak out about it you are punished, one way ,shape, form or other, you will be punished least that is the way it is felt in Progressive Conservative Alberta and it is seems to be reenacting at the Federal levels.

So what do we really have to do?

IMHO we have to stand for what’s Right for everyone as a whole. If you don’t want it done to you: then don’t do it to others, in every manner

Are Arm's Length Government Agencies in Reality an N.G.O ? ( non-government organization) what is a N.G.O or should say who?

A non-governmental organization (NGO) is a legally
constituted, non-governmental organization
created by natural or legal
persons with no participation or representation of any government.
In the cases in which NGOs are funded totally or partially by
governments, the NGO maintains its non-governmental status by excluding
government representatives from membership in the organization. Unlike
the term "intergovernmental organization", "non-governmental organization" is a term in general use but is not a
legal definition. In many jurisdictions, these types of organization are
defined as "civil society organizations" or referred to by other names.

The legal form of NGOs is diverse and depends upon homegrown variations in each country's laws and practices. However, four main family groups of NGOs can be found worldwide:^[19]

• Unincorporated and voluntary association
• Trusts, charities and foundations
• Companies not just for profit
• Entities formed or registered under special NGO or nonprofit laws

NGOs are not subjects of international law, as states are. An exception is the International Committee of the Red Cross, which is subject to certain specific matters, mainly relating to the Convention" class="mw-redirect"">Geneva Convention.

There is a growing movement within the “non”-profit and “non”-government sector to define itself in a more constructive, accurate way. Instead of being defined by “non” words, organizations are suggesting new
terminology to describe the sector. The term “civil society organization” (CSO) has been used by a growing number of organizations, such as the Center for the Study of Global Governance.

The term “citizen sector organization” (CSO) has also been advocated to
describe the sector — as one of citizens, for citizens.This labels and positions the sector as its own entity, without relying
on language used for the government or business sectors. However some
have argued that this is not particularly helpful given that most NGOs
are in fact funded by governments and business and that some NGOs are
clearly hostile to independently organized " people's organizations".

As from previous posting's, we learned in the History of the Workers Compensation Board of Canada, it was based off the Compensation practices of Chancellor Von-Bismark. From that meeting of Sir Merrideth and other Countries examining his system they formed an International N.G.O, which is what we have today. Approximately  5 years later W.W.I broke out and we know the out come from there;
The League of Nations (LON) was an inter-governmental organization founded as a result of the of Versailles"">Treaty of Versailles in 1919–1920, and the precursor to the United Nations. At its greatest extent from 28 September 1934 to 23 February 1935, it had 58 members. The League's primary goals as stated in its Covenant included preventing war through collective security, disarmament, and settling international disputes through negotiation and arbitration.^[1]
Other goals in this and related treaties included labor conditions,
just treatment of native inhabitants, trafficking in trafficking"">persons and trafficking" class="mw-redirect"">drugs, arms trade, globalhealth, prisoners of war, and Treaties"">protection of minorities in Europe.

The UN came into existence on October 24, 1945, after ratification of the Charter by the five permanent members of the Security Council — China"">Republic of China, France, USSR, Kingdom"">United Kingdom, and the UnitedStates — and by a majority of the other 46 signatories.{{citation
needed|date=April 2010}}

The League of Nations formally dissolved itself on 18 April 1946 and transferred its mission to the United Nations.

So out of this we have an International-Government body that stands up for Rights and Freedoms and N.G.O's that work against our Rights and Freedoms, was this the thoughts of pre - W.W.I, where as N.G.O's would do all the business while the Government sat back and dictated to them all and the N.G.O's were allowed total control of the entire population?

How far back in History has our Rights being Ignored and slowly removed ?
http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=34412&Cr=indigenous&Cr1=

If this is the case then why does our Canadian Government allow these violation's of United Nations Rights and freedoms to go to the extent they are? After all look at the closures of Human Rights Offices in Canada, the people that were turned away from their doors; maybe we need a closer look at who runs the N.G.O's,

the heads of the major multinational corporations,international banks, world financial institutions, global governing bodies think tanks; powerful individuals of the likes of: David Rockefeller,  various European monarchs, including,Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, daughter of founding member, Prince Bernhard , Queen Sofia and King Juan Carlos of Spain

According to The Globe and Mail, such Canadian Prime Ministers have, in the past, (often before becoming
Prime Minister), attended a Conference as a guest, including:Pierre Trudeau, Jean Chretien, Paul Martin
and Stephen Harper, Conrad Black and others , including International Heads of State.

This particular statement is very disturbing 

Tony Blair attended the conference before becoming Prime Minister, as did the current British Prime
Minister, Gordon Brown, who also recently called for the establishment of a "new world order."

  
Which is very scary to me , as it looks like to me that those who believe in the New World Order have infiltrated the United Nations.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_United_Nations

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-governmental_organizations#Types_o...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/League_of_Nations

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&search=stephen+harper+bilderberg+group&go=Go



btw way N.G.O is another term for Board, Commission, Corporation, Association

What if Organized crime is bigger then the Police can handle?

Is Calgary police Service going to need Interpol's help?
http://bit.ly/9EtH3L
Especially when the investigation gets to http://bit.ly/beBCDd   ; http://abusebyalbertasworkerscompensation.blogspot.com/
& ; http://bit.ly/b8SAPe ?

The later is where they should start IMHO if they think it can be done in this totalitarian/ authoritarian/ corrupted country our Governments have put us in.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IiBSdBDeucU&feature=related

So if nothing is done about the Organized Corporate Crime, which can be considered Criminal Capitalism, does that make Canada a Corrupt Capitalistic Country; which would be better for Canadians ?
Monarchy or Despotism ?

Enough is Enough

I have had enough of the Alberta Government, family Services, lack of Law enforcement action and the Workers Compensation Board, to have our finances cut off from Social Assistance is bad enough but 10 years ago the same type of sneaky actions were committed, along with other situations since that are criminally questionable to the Courts but in Alberta try and get a fair court hearing when dealing with the Alberta Progressive Conservative Government, to the point of witnessing the Crown admitting in the court room, in front of the Judge that professionals hired in the case did not need information in order to deal with the situation at hand.It was only by true innocence of the accusations by the Alberta Agency that enabled the proper court decision, how ever that wasn't the same for the next time they got me into court, at that time I believe my specialized lawyer was not working in my best interest.
so lets start with today's letter, sent out to Members of the Alberta Legislature Members of the opposition, national media investigative reporters that have been paying attention to this situation for some time now and Interpol.
here is the letter sent out:BE SURE TO READ THE LINKS PROVIDED

Dear Ms.Denny

I am making claim to Mental Stress caused by the Worker’s Compensation Board of Alberta and its employees.
Reasons and cause:
1. Employer’s attempt to prevent loss time injury on August 25th, 1999
2. WCB’s denial of claim November 1999
3. WCB’s false claim of employers offer of employment in November 1999
4. WCB’s false claim of overpayments not being recovered ; only to have been recovered 3 separate times
5. WCB’s refusal to upgrading at the request of academic instructors 2003.
6. WCB’s enforcement of academic training without upgrading 2003, then to claim it was offered but ”claimant” refused 2007
7. WCB’s refusal of request by claimant to finishing electrical training in 2002, only to “have the same training” incorporated in 2007.
8. WCB’s interference/ stating out come of Appeals Commissions decisions
9. Manipulation of information causing criminal record
10. WCB’s practice of ignoring Court rulings
11. Money taken or withheld from me and put towards over payment before any court proceeding then to have equal amount removed after proceedings.
12. Manipulation of finances/ file information
13. Stating on documents that overpayments to be dealt with via Appeals Commission ; while Appeals Commission refused to deal such matters
14. Altering Appeals decisions by submitting information after the Appeals Commission hearing.
15. WCB staff threatens the Appeals Commission not to proceed with Appeal.
16. To be deemed in an occupation that is (by WCB statistics) unsuitable due to injury.
17. To be refused business start-up due to claims manager statement of “no business experience” when exclusive customer and manufacturer were already in place and The Business Development Bank's statement of 45% chance of success without proper proto-type; which is why I asked for assistance in creating proto-type, if I had received that I would now be on a different business venture.
18. Inability to get business grants due to WCB’s involvement (as I am WCB’s responsibility)
19. Ridicule and ultimatums while in Millard Rehabilitation Center, as well as the same that has happened through out the history of my claim, when dealing with claim managers.
20. To have a WCB employee contact Social Services claiming I made approx $816.00 per month when my year end T-5 states $943.11 for the year. Causing my family to be without any income what so ever.
21. Sleepless nights and unnecessary aggravations due to the workings of the WCB.
22. Every time I had come up with an idea to help my life it has been denied any assistance by the WCB, for what reasons I do not know, which in turn is non-compliance by the WCB.
23. Informed that I am receiving proper updated information about overpayments when I receive no such information for months or what my benefit income is, for that particular year.
24. Told to take potential employers to the labour board when not hired, when it is WCB’s responsibility to ensure that I am capable of employment.

I think this enough for now, but then again I am not sure, as chronic pain does cause brain shrinkage and also contributes to stress, which again is a WCB issue.

Thank you
Sincerely Ken

reply from Ms.Denny:
As with any other claim, the WCB investigates the cause to determine whether the claim is acceptable. Claims for this type of injury are eligible for compensation only when "all" of the following criteria are met;
There is a confirmed psychological or psychiatric diagnosis as described in the DSM-IV
The work related events or stressors are the predominant cause of injury
the work related events are excessive or unusual in comparison to the normal pressures and tensions experienced by the average worker in a similar occupation and
there is objective conformation of the events.

What was happening in 2000 is happening again today March 11th 2010 with Family services , http://abusebyalbertasworkerscompensation.blogspot.com/2009/05/provincial-government-agencies-all-work.html , only reason why is due to http://abusebyalbertasworkerscompensation.blogspot.com/2010/02/letter-to-mrmah-legal-representative-to.html and http://abusebyalbertasworkerscompensation.blogspot.com/
if that is not enough information for you, please feel free to contact me, with what is seemingly to be a set up and threat to my family, due to statements of criminal activities in order to prevent me from disclosing all I have found, as this is not the first time in Alberta this type of situation has occurred, which you can find within these provided links.

Here is one link that I had missed and it could be considered to be an important one
http://iwocac.ning.com/forum/topics/political-corruption-as