What kind of Government do we have in Alberta ? Canada?

Our political leaders state that in Canada we have a Democracy, which is defined as:
:A form of government in which the people freely govern themselves; where the executive (or administrative) and law-making (or legislative) power is given to persons chosen by the population; the free people. Legal Dictionary http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/D/Democracy.aspx

1. Government by the people, exercised either directly or through elected representatives.

2. A political or social unit that has such a government.

3. The common people, considered as the primary source of political power.

4. Majority rule.

5. The principles of social equality and respect for the individual within a community.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/democracy

---

But then anyone who has witnessed the workings of our Governments in Canada in the past few years, will recognize that we have not been living in a Democratic Society, especially those who live in Alberta, where our Land Owner Rights (as an example) have been dwindling away at a very fast pace, Equal Justice as another example. As all this is by Governments that act on their own with no regard to what the Citizens of 

Alberta or Canada have to say, which in turn leads us to another style of Government known as Dictatorship

1.

a country, government, or the form of government in which absolute power is exercised by a dictator.

2.

absolute, imperious, or overbearing power or control.

3.

the office or position held by a dictator.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/dictatorship

There have been many, including Politicians, that use the word Socialist on those who speak up against the actions of our Rights being eroded away for the benefit of Corporations, just as our Environment is suffering for the same reason's:
Definition of Socialism
1

: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods

2

a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

3

: a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done 

 via http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/socialism

A vast majority of Canadians and Albertans have increasingly stated that our Governments are Puppets of a puppet master, some are under the impression that we are controlled by U.S & other foreign influences , while others claim it to be Corporate interests(possibly all of the above), especially in Alberta where it seems that Large Corporations dealing in Energy , like Oil , Electricity , even our water is who pulls the strings of  the present Alberta Government.

Puppet Governments:

A government that is under the control of another power.

http://www.answers.com/topic/puppet-government#ixzz1CYalGK67

puppet government - a government that is appointed by and whose affairs are directed by an outside authority that may impose hardships on those governed pupet regime, puppet state authorities, government, regime - the organization that is the governing authority of a political unit; "the government reduced taxes"; "the matter was referred to higher authorities" http://www.thefreedictionary.com/puppet+government Fascism: a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.

Seems what really have is a cross between Dictatorship, Socialist & Puppet Governments and Fascism as there is no evidence of Democracy in this country, under our present Leading Political Parties.

Gangs: What are they?

I have heard for many years, with more attention each year regarding the gangs in our cities, before that it was regarding outlaw bike gangs and the harm to our society they inflict.

Webster's definition of a Gang :
1) A group of people associated or working together.
 2) A group of people associated for some criminal or anti-social purpose.
3) To form into a gang.
4) to gang up on; to attack as a group.


 #1:
A group of people associated or working together:
Covers every known association, group, corporation, political party, employees or any congregation of people that work together for any purpose.

#2:
A group of people associated for some criminal or anti-social purpose:

This definition relates directly to the Gangs that we mainly associate this word to, the criminal gangs, street gangs, outlaw biker gangs etc.

#3:
To form into a gang:
This where recruiting come into play, the gang with the most members has the best odds of overcoming rival gangs, in recruiting more of those who follow the thoughts and mindset of the other gang members to promote their beliefs, causes and power, no matter right or wrong, legal or not.

#4:
To gang up on; to attack as a group:

What was once called Ganging upon physically is now known as "Swarming" which is a form of inflicting terror upon the subject that has been chosen to attack. That kind of ganging can be done in various ways:
by 2 or more people mocking and ridiculing another for various purposes, to instill Terror, for Humiliation, to Pressure others into doing their bidding , in some cases just to allow for the "Gang"  to fulfill their wishes of recognition, authority over others, to aggressively defend that particular gang and denounce their rivals while defending the negative of their gang upon others.

I am a sportsman, love the outdoors and all that goes with it, I sometimes (mostly out of boredom) like to  call going "Fishing", as a rule I openly bring out the truth of Political Parties, which a few times gets some retaliation by the party supporter's, who call me a liar and want proof of what I say , of which I supply 99.9% of the time; while those who ask, refuse to accept the evidence 99% of the time, with comments of take it to the courts then if you have so much evidence: you can't take criminal acts to be investigated of those who break the laws, when they are the same associates that make the Law's.

So I went fishing to find out what would happen when a situation was brought out to the Political Party followers. The first thing to happen was a form of defense, that used a rivals similar situation, to justify the actions of their rival Political Party, as in "if they can do it why can't we" , " they did it more" and many other reasons for the wrongful acts of their Party, this goes for all Political Party supporters. Where is this going to lead us? to the same situation as the States where a Party Leader/Candidate makes statements of aggression towards individuals or will it get worse as some people carry their Political beliefs higher then they do their religion's, and we all know from history on how religious beliefs have caused many violent conflicts.

I write this as I had gone "Fishing" out of curiosity of how aggressive Political Party Supporters are or can be, I picked a particular person to do this with as ( person I never met) I had been placed on a list called "Enemies of Freedom", when I went to this person with a partially true comment I was then attacked by a few others, this attack lasted over an hour and the attacks were coming in so fast I wasn't able to keep up with all of what they had to say, I became over whelmed with the flood of comments, from them defending their Party & its Leader, defamatory comments of other Parties, to being called what ever they considered an insult, a Marxist, Communist, Socialist, Liberal ,etc; having my words twisted to fit their Parties agenda of various topics and to denounce another Party that I wasn't supporting, or mentioned until after the discussion took into that direction, it had started to get way out of hand, if it wasn't for important offline obligations ( I do have responsibilities & obligations in life) I would have kept up the "discussion" to gain more insight into the extremes these people would have gone. As the main topic of discussion that started it all was over the handling & wasting of Billions and the possibly not so criminal actions, along with actual criminal actions by the Political Parties involved in this discussion.

Now back to the Title of this posting "Gangs; what are they" , from the definitions above and the actions related in this posting, the Political Parties in Canada are no different then any Street or Outlaw Biker Gang's, they all follow the Websters definition of "GANG", in every aspect , including to fulfilling requests of support  by those who are party members over those who are not, regardless of which level of Governments or which agency that is being dealt with.

Political Parties or No Parties Period?

MPs slam 'obscene' Tory patronage posts  is the head line on CBC

 Majority of the comments was about the other political party did that as well. 
comment by friend L.G:
"You know what gets me ... is they all do it .... the liberals were so bad at this its not funny. Many departments are still controlled by the liberals .... all of them do these appointments because they know if somthing goes wrong with an election"

 IMHO:
What we need is either an Honest Political party or abolish the Party system and stick with Independents, through them we can then, elect out of the Independents as to who will speak on behalf of Canadians. Place a Law; that at any time Citizens can petition for a Bi-election on that person, a recall or impeachment of any Political figure that Canadians feel who is not doing their job in the interests of Canadians as a whole. Any future corruption, criminal acts or mis-use of elected position will result in Incarceration.

Thats why I say abolish the party system which put an ending partisanship, which seems to be a major issue for everyone, from stacking the political views to corruption. Not to have those who have proven to be there for Canada as a whole, lose their positions, at one persons command, which is happening in Federal Government as well as Provincial

Therefore I believe to have the communities, choose their own community speaker, each community speaker takes concerns to regional speakers ( of whom are chosen by all those before them) keep working that way to national /international speaker for Canadians, we all have a say in our particular interest to make the decisions for Canada as we do for our individual lives.
Basically the same thing that we have now, just no party involvement, with 100% say of Canadian  Business with-in our Nation; along with International Relations: Granted to the Citizens of Canada as a whole and within their own communities, to make their voice known to the concerns of their community where those voices set the census of the community

Lets Dissect Ed Stelmach’s Big Plan’s for New Session

Summaries of nine pieces of legislation that the Conservatives plan to pursue this winter and spring offer a glimpse of the government’s agenda. 
•
Alberta Competitiveness Act aims to increase partnerships between the government and industry and improve the province’s competitive edge in the global economy;

Is this giving the large Corporations more power inAlberta on an International scale along with more input into Government policy and Legislation?

• Professional Statutes Amendment Act requires professional regulatory organizations to consult with ministers before changing which education courses or programs are required for registry;

Does this mean that Regulatory Organizations have been picking and choosing on those who they wish to train or re-train?

• Securities Amendment Act will allow for the regulation of credit-rating agencies and will broaden the Alberta Securities Commission’s power to deal with faulty disclosure statements;

Is the Government saying that the credit rating agencies investigating into Alberta Securities Commission are faulty? Claiming that anyone that speaks out against their "private dealings" are wrong as the Alberta Government is wanting to protect all those investors who profited by these acts?

• Elections Statutes Amendment Act will streamline how provincial elections are held;

This so the Progressive Conservative Party can control the elections much more effectively and secretly then they already have been. After all hasn't Alberta brought in another politician to speak publicly and give his advice, that has been under question for elections tampering in his own country

• Fatal Accidents Amendment Act will make eligibility for bereavement damages less restrictive;

Does this pertain to death by employment (WCB);, by criminal acts; 3^rd party accidents; covered by work insurance; regular insurances or the uninsured ?

• Witness Security Act will establish a provincial witness security program to complement the current federal system;

This in place to protect those involved in the new Bill’s to be introduced? Certainly wouldn't be put in place for me or any other person that blows the whistle on Alberta Government

• Local Authorities Election Statutes Amendment Act clarifies rules of residency for local government elections;

Am interested to hear more, as there are many windows to this statement, which could go any direction, like does this pertain to the Candidate , the voter or where most of a certain partisan community lives?

• Emergency Management Amendment Act will improve liability protection for search and rescue members and their organizations;

After what happened in B.C this makes e wonder if it is to protect the Volunteers from law suit of the people they rescue or  the insurance companies that say the person was injured by the rescuers, so they can get their cost's back
The Dangerous Goods Transportation and Handling Amendment Act will harmonize provincial rules with federal legislation.

This  makes some sense as keeping all the Dangerous Goods rules of the road equal across Canada,only a professional truck driver would know of any implications here;
now can they do something about the rail roads?